Steven Jorgensen

Steven Jorgensen

Charlotte Metro
637 followers 500+ connections

About

Principal Process Engineer with 10+ years of experience delivering complex process and…

Activity

Join now to see all activity

Experience

  • BW Water Graphic

    BW Water

    Charlotte, NC

  • -

    Blacksburg, Virginia, United States

  • -

    Chandler

  • -

    Kiryat Gat, South District, Israel

  • -

    Chandler, Arizona, United States

  • -

    Oregon, United States

  • -

    Kiryat Gat, South District, Israel

  • -

    Chandler, Arizona, United States

  • -

    Portland, Oregon, United States

  • -

    Phoenix, Arizona Area

  • -

    Chandler

  • -

    Gilbert Arizona

Education

Licenses & Certifications

Volunteer Experience

  • Musician

    Desert Cove Nursing Center

    - 2 years 1 month

    Social Services

    Part of a small Brass band From Chandler High. Playing holiday music for the residence of Desert Cove for three weekends in December of 2004, 2005 and 2006.

Courses

  • Applied Chemical Thermodynamics

    CHE 342

  • Business & Industrial Engineering

    IEE 220

  • Chemical Engineering Laboratory I

    CHE 352

  • Chemical Engineering Laboratory II

    CHE 451

  • Chemical Reactor Design

    CHE 442

  • Introduction to Chemical Processing

    CHE 211

  • Introduction to Statistical Analysis

    STP 420

  • Material Structures

    MSE 250

  • Modern Differential Equations

    MAT 275

  • Modern Separations

    CHE 433

  • Numerical Methods for Engineers

    CEE 384

  • Organic Chemistry I

    CHM 233

  • Organic Chemistry II

    CHM 234

  • Physical Chemistry

    CHM 452

  • Principles of Chemical Engineering

    CHE 432

  • Process Design

    CHE 462

  • Process Dynamic Control

    CHE 461

  • Six Sigma

    CHE 496

  • Transport Phenomena: Fluid I

    CHE 231

  • Transport Phenomena: Fluids II: Heat & Mass Transport

    CHE 334

Projects

  • Senior Level Process Design

    Develop a (minimum) Level 4 design of a process to replace a minimum of 5% of current U.S. production capacity of a non-fuel commodity chemical normally derived (directly or through intermediate steps) from coal, petroleum, or natural gas, with a process that uses either plants (including algae) or animals as feedstock/feedstock source (i.e., as the source of carbon).

    Some constraints:
    • The end product commodity chemical may not have its primary use as a fuel (ethanol e.g.)…

    Develop a (minimum) Level 4 design of a process to replace a minimum of 5% of current U.S. production capacity of a non-fuel commodity chemical normally derived (directly or through intermediate steps) from coal, petroleum, or natural gas, with a process that uses either plants (including algae) or animals as feedstock/feedstock source (i.e., as the source of carbon).

    Some constraints:
    • The end product commodity chemical may not have its primary use as a fuel (ethanol e.g.), although the process may produce a chemical that is normally a fuel as an intermediate.
    • The process must be able to produce no less than 5% of 2010 U.S. capacity, and ideally, be able to produce up to 10% of 2010 U.S. capacity. This means that annual availability of your plant/animal source must be sufficient – or must be reasonably able to be increased – to supply your proposed process.
    • Your process must not use the edible portion of any of these major U.S. food / animal feed crops: barley, canola (rapeseed), corn, flaxseed, oats, peanuts, potatoes, rice, sorghum, soybeans, or wheat. Your process may use non-edible portions of these crops, such as straw, cobs, peels, hulls, or the edible portion of any other food/animal feed crop.
    • If you choose microbial production, the source of its carbon has the same restrictions as above – e.g., you cannot use fermentation with a rice or corn feedstock, for example. Microbes can also use carbon dioxide as their carbon source, as appropriate.

    Other creators
    See project
  • Chemical process Design (Junior Level)

    Steam methane reforming (SMR) is the dominant technology for producing hydrogen today. Evaluate the technical and economic viability of producing hydrogen by integrating a modern-type reforming plant with a nuclear power plant and CO2 capture technology.
    Specifically, completing a Study Design of a first-of-its-kind hydrogen plant that utilizes heat generated by the nuclear power plant as an energy source for the main steam reforming reactors. The plant will in addition employ high…

    Steam methane reforming (SMR) is the dominant technology for producing hydrogen today. Evaluate the technical and economic viability of producing hydrogen by integrating a modern-type reforming plant with a nuclear power plant and CO2 capture technology.
    Specifically, completing a Study Design of a first-of-its-kind hydrogen plant that utilizes heat generated by the nuclear power plant as an energy source for the main steam reforming reactors. The plant will in addition employ high efficiency CO2 capture to provide a climate-change-friendly process for hydrogen production.

    Other creators
    • Zachary Gordon
    • Paul McAfee
    • Jeff Bales
    • Nader Warrayat
    See project

Honors & Awards

  • Dean's List

    Arizona State University

Languages

  • English

    -

  • German

    Elementary proficiency

Organizations

  • Society of Petroleum Engineers

    Founding Member of Arizona State University Chapter

More activity by Steven

View Steven’s full profile

  • See who you know in common
  • Get introduced
  • Contact Steven directly
Join to view full profile

Explore top content on LinkedIn

Find curated posts and insights for relevant topics all in one place.

View top content

Add new skills with these courses