Ten Points reposted this
A few days ago I wrote about The Zones of Regulation, Inc.: why the evidence is thinner than its classroom ubiquity suggests, and why their model gives children a conceptually flawed map of their own emotions. Here's what I'd use instead. The mood metre, developed at the Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence as part of the RULER approach, is the most defensible alternative I know. It plots emotions across two axes: energy and happiness. That second axis is where it parts ways with ZoR in a fundamental way. ZoR is a one-axis model. It organises emotions by energy level alone, which means excited and stressed share the yellow zone despite being completely different states requiring completely different responses. The mood metre separates them immediately. A child can see why, and so can the adult deciding how to respond. The Yale model uses pleasantness rather than happiness as the second axis, because happiness is itself an emotion on the metre. I use happiness with younger children because it's more intuitive. With older children, the distinction becomes a useful conversation in itself. 92% of studies reviewed on Consensus.App find positive effects on classroom climate, student competence, and academic outcomes. Research summary in the comments. The image below is the mood metre that Ten Points have adapted for upper KS2. Keen to hear from those of you who raised great points and difficult questions last time, especially around neurodivergent children. Liz Robson Nazim Bhuiyan Cathy Wassell Sarah Castell Holly Sprake-Hill Jennifer Wickham Paul Brannan Sarah Yanshin-Hall Jacquelyne Garner Charlotte Dias Susanne Nelson Dr Jenny Finnan Martin Stepney Juli R. Kayleigh Forbes #Education #Wellbeing #SEL #EvidenceInformed