A tokenized Treasury can be minted in a few clicks and still take until Monday to move between two venues. The RWA market crossed $31.8 billion on-chain, and what's slowing it down now has nothing to do with the technology. Permissions, licenses, and custody approvals sit between an asset and the places it could actually be used. > On-chain RWA value reached $31.8B as of May 31, with active tokenized RWAs up roughly 589% since early 2025. > Tokenized public equities grew about 422%; bond and money-market products added around $6.5B. > The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) begins limited-production tokenized trades in July, with a broader commercial rollout in October and 50+ firms in the working group. > Securitize listed on the NYSE as SECZ on July 2 and issued its own common stock on public chains, around $266–295M in tokenized float. . . The rails are being built at the top of the stack, while the layer that would make them useful sits one level down, still unfinished. A tokenized security today still moves like a wire transfer on a bank holiday. Whitelist delays, transfer windows, off-chain signoffs, and siloed identity checks stack into a separate permission set at every venue. When a token can't move into a money-market pool on a Saturday because a back-office approval is pending, composability stops being real. That friction is the whole opportunity. A tokenized asset becomes valuable when it can serve as collateral in a lending market, sit inside a managed vault, and settle across venues without a three-day compliance detour. Issuance was the first race, and it has largely been won. The layer that turns a permissioned token into productive, deployable capital is the one still being contested. Whoever solves for access within the risk controls institutions require, through portable identity, on-chain attestations, and transfer rules written in code, captures the value that issuance alone never will. Smart money is tracking the permission layer, because that's where the bottleneck now lives. The next phase of RWA growth belongs to the infrastructure that makes tokenized capital deployable, turning assets that merely sit on-chain into capital that actually works.
About us
Bracket's platform infrastructure provides key services to securely scale both on and off-chain yield vaults. Backed By Binance Labs.
- Website
-
https://www.bracket.fi/
External link for Bracket
- Industry
- Blockchain Services
- Company size
- 2-10 employees
- Type
- Partnership
Employees at Bracket
Updates
-
One of the largest privately held gold reserves on earth is about to become borrowable collateral. Tether.io is bringing its $23 billion physical gold stockpile on-chain as working capital. Through a partnership with lender Ledn, holders of Tether Gold (XAUT) will be able to borrow against their tokenized bullion later this year without selling the underlying asset. > ~140 metric tons of physical gold in Swiss vaults, each $XAUT representing one troy ounce. > XAUT market cap past $3 billion, trading around $4,070 per token. > Loans denominated in USDT and the newly launched USAT, mirroring Ledn's bitcoin-backed model. > Launching into a market sitting at Extreme Fear, index at 18, BTC near $60K. . . The timing is the signal. A lending product arriving in a market this depressed speaks to demand for liquidity from holders who intend to keep their positions through the downturn, accessing cash without triggering a sale. Gold changes the collateral math. Its volatility profile runs far below bitcoin's, which means lower liquidation risk and room for more favorable loan-to-value ratios. For an allocator holding a long-term store of value, that combination turns a static position into a source of on-chain liquidity. There's a line worth watching, though. Ledn holds collateral on a 1:1 basis and explicitly does not rehypothecate or generate yield on it. The borrowing unlocks liquidity while the gold itself stays parked. The asset becomes useful without becoming productive. That gap is where the next phase sits. Turning a tokenized asset into collateral is the first step. Turning it into collateral that also earns, within defined risk parameters, is the harder problem and the one that compounds. Smart money is watching tokenized commodities cross from passive holdings into active financial infrastructure. Gold became the test case precisely because it's the oldest store of value there is, and what works for bullion works for every real-world asset that follows it on-chain.
-
-
A Tier-1 global bank just published equity-style research coverage on a DeFi protocol, complete with a price target, a year-by-year model, and a 40x call. On June 15, Standard Chartered initiated formal coverage on Uniswap, forecasting UNI at $100 by 2030 from roughly $2.50 today. Geoffrey Kendrick, the bank's Global Head of Digital Assets Research, put it plainly: the next opportunity for generational wealth in digital assets comes through DeFi protocols. > Tokenized assets on-chain projected to grow from $340B today to $4 trillion by end-2028. > Share of tokenized assets active in DeFi rising from 3% to 30% by 2030. > Total DeFi TVL forecast at $2.7 trillion by 2030, a 37x increase. > UNI year-by-year: $6.50, $20, $40, $65, $100. . . The price target made the headlines, but the number that matters sits underneath it. Standard Chartered's entire thesis rests on a single structural shift: tokenized assets moving from 3.5% active in DeFi to 30%. Today, the overwhelming majority of tokenized capital sits idle, issued on-chain and held in custody while doing nothing. The bank is underwriting the assumption that these changes will make the capital active. That's the same gap the market has been circling for months, now formalized into a Tier-1 investment thesis. Getting assets on-chain was never the hard part. What the report is actually betting on is the infrastructure layer that turns tokenized assets into deployed, productive capital. There's a catch that the bank acknowledges. Most institutional tokenization today is permissioned. BlackRock's BUIDL trades through gated access, pre-approved investors, and multi-million-dollar minimums. For 3.5% to become 30%, tokenized assets need infrastructure that can deploy them with the risk controls institutions require, without forcing them into fully open and unmanaged venues. Smart money is looking past the UNI call to the assumption underneath it. The next phase of value accrues to whoever can move tokenized capital from idle to active within institutional risk parameters.
-
-
J.P. Morgan, Citi, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo are building a shared blockchain together. The reason is defensive. The four largest banks in America are developing a Tokenized Deposit Network, operated through The Clearing House, targeting a launch in the first half of 2027. The goal is to keep deposits from leaving the banking system for stablecoins. > Tokenized deposits issued directly by banks as digital versions of customer deposits, inside the existing regulatory framework with consumer protections intact. > JPMorgan already runs Kinexys, processing institutional payments via JPM Coin, and launched a tokenized deposit token on Base earlier in 2026. > The pitch to clients: instant 24/7 settlement, programmable payments, blockchain-speed money movement. > The audience that matters most is the Federal Reserve. . . For two years, the question was whether incumbent banks would adopt tokenization at all. When the four institutions that anchor the US banking system commit to building blockchain settlement rails, that debate is settled. The motivation is what stands out. The banks aren't doing this out of conviction about crypto. They're responding to capital that was already moving. Treasury teams running cross-border settlements in USDC care that stablecoin rails run on Sunday at 2 AM and bank wires don't. The banks watched that gap turn into an exit and started building to close it. Once deposits are tokenized and programmable, money stops sitting in an account and starts executing. Settlement, collateral, and yield all become functions of what the infrastructure layer can do with capital that now moves at blockchain speed. The banks are solving for retention. Turning programmable capital into productive capital through managed strategies is a different problem, and it's the one that compounds. Smart money read this signal when JPMorgan put a deposit token on a public chain. The Tokenized Deposit Network confirms that tokenized money is becoming the default, and the infrastructure that deploys it is where the next decade of value accrues.
-
-
Citi just put a number on where tokenization ends up. The base case is $5.5 trillion by 2030. The bull case is $8.2 trillion. Today's market sits at $17 billion. That's a 323x growth window in four years, and for the first time, the timeline is anchored to infrastructure moves that are already on the calendar. > DTCC, which custodies $114 trillion in assets and processes virtually every securities trade in the US, begins limited production of tokenized securities in July 2026. > NYSE, ICE, and Nasdaq already approved for tokenized equity platforms. > Stablecoins projected to generate up to $1 trillion in new on-chain Treasury demand. > Citi rates tokenization at 1.5 out of 10 on its adoption curve. Most of the growth is still ahead. . . What separates this report from earlier tokenization forecasts is the specificity of the infrastructure commitments, grounded in signed announcements from the entities that run American capital markets, rather than assumptions about institutional interest. The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) , going live in July, is the post-trade settlement backbone of US equities, beginning to process tokenized trades in production. When that happens, tokenized securities stop being an alternative format and start being part of the same settlement stack that handles every stock trade in the country. Citi's report identifies the winners as "structural orchestrators", institutions that control both the asset and the payment rail. Whoever controls the combination of tokenized asset issuance and on-chain settlement infrastructure captures the compounding value of both. Smart money has been positioned around this convergence for two years. The $17 billion market today sits at 1.5 on Citi's adoption curve; the infrastructure is committed, the regulatory clearances are in place, and, for the first time, the timeline is specific enough to build around. Source in 🧵
-
-
On May 29 at 4:00 PM CT, the CME gap officially died. CME Group, the world's largest derivatives exchange, switched its Bitcoin and Ethereum futures to 24/7 trading on Globex, ending a structural quirk that defined crypto markets for years. The weekend blackout is gone. Monday's gap open is gone with it. > $3 trillion in notional volume across CME crypto futures and options in 2025. > Average daily volume up 46% year-over-year in 2026. > BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, ADA, LINK, XLM, AVAX, and SUI all now trade continuously on regulated infrastructure. > ADV of 407,200 contracts, a record. . . The structural argument was simple. Hedge funds, corporate treasury desks, and asset managers running crypto positions cannot manage risk if the primary regulated futures venue closes for 48 hours every weekend. Every Sunday gap-open was a moment of accumulated, unhedged exposure, resolved rapidly at open, often with volatility that had nothing to do with fundamentals. The liquidity reality is more complicated. IBIT options still hold $27-30B in open interest against roughly $800M in CME crypto options. Offshore perpetuals remain the dominant venue for active trading. CME removed a structural constraint, but the battle for where institutional volume actually settles is still playing out. What the 24/7 launch signals is less about CME's market share and more about the direction of infrastructure build-out. Traditional finance is no longer trying to fit crypto into existing market hours; it's rebuilding the plumbing around the way crypto already works. Smart money has been positioning around this convergence for two years. The CME gap closing is the clearest sign yet that the institutional market structure for crypto is being built to last.
-
-
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission was expected to release its innovation exemption for tokenized stocks on May 18. It didn't. Exchanges pushed back. The question they raised wasn't about technology or compliance; it was more fundamental than that: When you hold a tokenized stock, what do you actually own? > Kraken's xStocks: 100 fully backed 1:1 tokenized US equities, $25B in transaction volume since June 2025. > The SEC's January guidance split tokenized equities into two structural categories. > DTCC planning limited production trades of tokenized securities in July 2026, commercial rollout by October. > The exemption, when it comes, will support only issuer-backed tokens, synthetic trackers excluded. . . The distinction matters more than the delay. Custodial tokenized securities sit on top of actual shares held by a regulated intermediary, dividends, voting rights, and bankruptcy protections intact. Synthetic tokenized securities track equity prices through derivatives, with no ownership or rights attached to the underlying asset. Two products that look identical on a trading interface carry completely different legal and economic profiles. An asset manager building yield strategies on tokenized equities, or an allocator using them as collateral, needs to know which bucket they're working with before anything else. The SEC's delay forced the market to answer a question it had been avoiding. Infrastructure built on price exposure and infrastructure built on ownership are not interchangeable, and in a market scaling toward trillions, that distinction is the whole ballgame. Smart money has been positioned around issuer-backed structures since the January guidance. The exemption delay is the regulatory system making sure everyone else catches up.
-
-
On May 14, the Senate Banking Committee voted 15-9 to advance the CLARITY Act, the most consequential Senate action on crypto legislation in history. Four months of gridlock. One vote. The bill now heads to the full Senate floor. > 309-page draft released May 12. Markup vote May 14. > 13 Republicans + 2 Democrats crossed party lines to advance it. > Polymarket odds repriced from 46% to 67% in 24 hours, the largest single-day move on the contract since January. > White House target: signed into law by July 4. . . What actually moved markets was buried on page 187. After four months of negotiations between the banking industry and crypto firms, the final text codifies a distinction that will reshape how yield is generated on-chain. Passive returns on stablecoins are banned. Activity-based rewards are protected. Liquidity provision, lending markets, staking, and on-chain participation are all still permitted. Holding USDC and earning 4% APY for doing nothing is no longer an option. The implications run beyond stablecoin issuers. Non-custodial protocols fall entirely outside the ban's scope, as their yield comes from genuine borrowing demand rather than from an issuer subsidizing returns. Centralized yield aggregators and passive custody products face the sharpest regulatory pressure. The law is being written around a structural shift that has been building in the market for over a year, and the direction it points has been clear long before this week's vote. Enforceable rules won't exist until 2027 at the earliest, with SEC and CFTC rulemaking still ahead. But the direction has been set for months. Smart money has been positioned around Section 404 since the January draft. The committee vote is the regulatory system catching up.
-
-
RWA perps just had their biggest quarter on record by a wide margin. $524.8 billion in total trading volume in Q1 2026 alone. More than the entire year of 2025, which itself recorded $313 billion. Four consecutive quarters of growth, accelerating each time. > Q1 2025: $29.7B → Q2: $67.4B → Q3: $77B → Q4: $138.9B → Q1 2026: $524.8B > Daily open interest jumped from $140M to $6.68B over fifteen months. > Tokenized stocks spot volume hit $15.1B in Q1 2026, overtaking all of H2 2025 in a single quarter. > Tokenized gold spot trading reached $90.7B in Q1 alone, surpassing the entire 2025 total. . . The tokenization narrative was built around custody. Bring the asset on-chain, hold it, earn the underlying yield. The market didn't stop there. Perpetuals, structured positions, yield through execution, Q1 2026, shows capital looking for ways to run strategies on top of these assets, not just hold them. Allocators are no longer asking whether tokenized RWAs belong in a portfolio. They're asking who can actually run them. Smart money tracked the open interest curve, not the market cap headline. A 47x increase in daily OI over fifteen months signals a structural shift in how capital intends to use these assets.
-
-
The New York Stock Exchange filed a rule change with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to allow tokenized equities and ETFs to trade on its market. Under the proposal, tokenized securities keep the same ticker, CUSIP, shareholder rights, and T+1 settlement through DTC, trading on the same order book as their traditional counterparts, with no separate venue and no liquidity fragmentation. Nasdaq already got approved in March. NYSE filed April 9. Public comments close May 13. > Russell 1000 constituents and major ETFs are eligible at launch. > DTC three-year pilot authorized under a December 2025 SEC no-action letter. > Tokenized and traditional shares trading side by side, no separate venue, no liquidity fragmentation. . . This is the world's most storied exchange choosing blockchain as a settlement layer, not as an experiment running alongside its core business. The distinction matters. Every previous wave of tokenization built parallel systems, new rails, new venues, and new liquidity pools that institutions had to opt into. What NYSE is proposing embeds tokenization into the existing market structure, where the capital already is. When that happens, tokenized equities stop being an asset class and start being a format. The same security, accessible on-chain, with the programmability and composability that blockchain settlement enables, dividends, voting rights, collateral use cases, without asking institutions to leave the system they've operated in for decades. The assets are coming on-chain. The question that follows is the same one it's always been: once they're there, who has the infrastructure to put them to work? Smart money is already working through what programmable equities unlock — collateral mobility, 24/7 settlement, yield strategies built on assets that previously just sat in custody. . . .
-